The control of public opinion

On 22 March 2013 the EEA (Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein) provided 147 million Euro in grants to non-government organizations to combat online hate speech. Some of the strategies these organizations are to employ have been outlined by the European Council:

1) Contacting ISPs (Internet Service Providers) of hate sites to have the websites removed.

2) Using counter-speech to give the impression that political incorrectness is a minority opinion.

3) Manipulating search engines to favor mainstream content.

4) Flagging illegal speech.

It’s unclear if people going around on YouTube reporting videos and comments are payed government employees, but it’s clear that millions go to NGOs for exactly that purpose. An organized effort is evident when politically incorrect videos are taken down for a copyright violation because of the background music used.

Manipulating Google search results has been considered with a focus on linking to PC mainstream sites. This remains a difficult strategy and I haven’t observed any obvious incidences. There’s no real need for this practice because the majority of White Nationalists still want inclusion in the mainstream, and happily link to it without ever getting a link back.

YouTube, Facebook, and major news site are a likely target for reporting comments containing hate speech. This however has proven fairly ineffective, likely because comments need to be removed within 12 hours for censorship to be effective, the large number of comments that are on the border of what is tolerated creating a slippery slope, and because people quote offensive comments which then requires more invasive censorship. As a result many news sites have removed their comment sections in recent years, or only allow approved comments.

The obvious and clearly outlined goal of the European Council is the complete eradication of political dissent.

Advertisements

The White Man March

For a couple of months people have been promoting and talking about the White Man March that was to take place March 15.

The end result was a couple of dozen people putting up banners and signs stating ‘Diversity = White Genocide’. Some of the banners were placed over highway crossings which seems like the most effective way to get a large number of people to see the message.

Image

All in all it seems impossible to gear people into action of any kind, something the media enjoyed pointing out in this instance. The general discontent is there and the majority of the European population wants the mass immigration to come to an end, but there appears to be no way to affect change.

The left controls the media and most of the Internet, keeping the majority ignorant and indoctrinated. There’s a solid 5% of the population that supports the abolishment of Multiculturalism, but obviously more is needed for people to break their silence.

Hopefully there will come a day that millions will take to the streets to protest the genocide of the European peoples.

Indigenous Peoples and Cultural Suicide

We’ve decided to write an article that examines what constitutes indigenous peoples, what constitutes genocide, and what constitutes lawful militant resistance. The article is linked below.

Indigenous Peoples and Cultural Suicide

To some extent other people have written about these subjects before, and subsequently we’re just piling the same crap that accomplishes nothing onto the giant heap of crap that is already out there. Words accomplish little without a plan of action, so it’s preferable to use as few words as possible and focus on action instead, but there’s no bigger waste of time than investing in a plan of action that is ineffective and doomed to fail.

Another problem is that wisdom is not additive; one genius pondering the meaning of life will find more wisdom than a million idiots collectively pondering the same subject. This is part of the reason why modern democracies, without exception, have failed the people they serve. This also means that one person with a conviction can make a difference at the intellectual level, though boots will still be needed on the ground.

This explains why the system is tolerant of criticism as long as it doesn’t materialize into a plan of action. Intellectuals in turn are hesitant to provide anything that goes beyond vague hints, while expecting the reader to read between the lines, or between the lines in-between the lines. Why is this so? Most intellectuals do not speak their mind because ultimately they lack courage, conviction, and cling to life like a child clings to its mother. They lost the game.

Back to the topic at hand.

Native Europeans qualify as indigenous peoples, but only if they self-identify as such, and only if they resolve to maintain their ancestral environments (territory) and systems (language, culture, and customs) as distinctive peoples. In the current political environment it will require courage and conviction to reject multiculturalism and reject assimilation.

“Our most important task ahead is to deconstruct the majority, and we must deconstruct them so thoroughly that they will never be able to call themselves the majority again.” –Thomas Hylland Eriksen (2008)

Cultural Marxism desires to decimate the European indigenous majority as they favor a culturally and racially divided society, better known as Multiculturalism. Subsequently the question becomes: Is the political desire to weaken a national group as morally wrong as the desire to destroy a national group?

If you view the political initiative to weaken a national group as a train, how do you intend to activate the breaks? As the people who started the train are the same who must stop the train, and these very people are the ones who are being weakened in an act of self-mutilation, isn’t this dangerous? As the train gets closer to the abyss of total destruction more people will also actively resist, and this resistance strengthens the resolve that further weakening is required. Most Cultural Marxists have also lost sight of the big picture, or are afraid to admit they have created a monster, that they themselves have become the evil they swore to eradicate.

We are Heinlein’s Orphans of the Sky, the people who set the train in motion are long gone, most think it’s normal to be on a fast moving train with nobody at the break. The end of the track is in sight, some see it coming, some don’t. Those in power know nothing but the train, they’re scared of change. Their religion dictates that the train leads to heaven, multicultural utopia, it must not be stopped. They are willing to lock up, even kill, anyone going for the emergency break.

So even if the actual intent is not genocide, these policies will result in a situation where the indigenous European population will be outnumbered in their historical homelands, and will no longer have the means to defend themselves from an actual genocide.

Is resisting genocide a human right?

If the answer is yes, is it a human right to resist policies that will make it impossible to resist your own genocide? History has shown that genocide does not happen over night, it is a long road, and in hindsight you can always see it coming. You need to stop the train the moment it takes a turn onto the wrong track, you don’t keep going on in the hopes that another turn will present itself when the lives of your people are at stake. We are in the tunnel, the lights are out, we know there is no light at the end of the tunnel, we think there is time left to stop the train… but we don’t know if it’s 20 years, 10 years, 1 year…

The exact regulations and restrictions on paramilitary activities can be found in the article, but the obvious conclusion is that lawful organized militant resistance is an exercise in futility. Even if you follow every single rule it’s unlikely that a nation will recognize a separatist paramilitary organization, nor is a nation required to by international law. This means that the armed resistance against your people’s genocide, even when following all the rules, will result in being labeled a terrorist.

One clear strategy would be for an organization to demand to be recognized before it will abide by international regulations for lawful militant resistance. There is however a moral dilemma as to whether a nation in support of genocidal policies can be negotiated with, and whether the Laws of War apply in a situation where people are resisting genocide. It could be beneficial to follow the Laws of War when doing so poses no tactical or strategical disadvantage, as this would pave the way for a lawful military conflict.

From a moral perspective all means justify the end if the end is to prevent your own genocide. The emergency break states to only use it in a case of emergency, the conductor announces over the intercom not to panic, that everything is alright. A train magician performs tricks, soothing music plays over the intercom, at last the windows are replaced with television screens. Some passengers accept the world shown on the new TV screen, some passengers look at each other nervously; they realize the conductor is basing his message on faith alone.

Civilian activities.

What remains on the civilian front is the creation of separatist political parties, self-defense against anti-fascists (who function as the paramilitary wing of Cultural Marxism), the glorification of martyrs, the complete rejection of Multiculturalism (in the economical, ideological, sociological, and political sense), using the tactics of Cultural Marxists against them, preparing for the worst, in-your-face propaganda, taking the message to the streets, and formulating a well-rounded plan of action.

Another issue of great importance is the need for the European peoples to consolidate their ideological framework, which should contain their identity, a sense of moral right, and an unwillingness to bow down before tyranny. We must conquer our fear and reject multiculturalism without compromise.

We must forgive those who are destroying us as well as themselves, for they know not what they do, but we must never fail to let them know that they are traitors: that there is no greater crime than treason.

PRISM (surveillance program)

I’ve ended up writing a lot about Internet security in the past couple of months. This week PRISM has received massive attention in the media.

What appears to be the case is that pretty much every phone call and text message in the USA is kept track off. When you call someone in the US the NSA (National Security Agency) stores what phone number the call came from, to what phone number the call was made, the duration of the call, and the gps coordinates of the locations of any cellphones involved. This information is routinely retrieved (by court order) and used during police investigations. European nations do the exact same thing.

It’s possible the content of text messages are stored, and that calls are transcribed. This takes massive amounts of storage, which is available. The US constitution forbids this data from being analyzed (unless the call or text message is to/from someone outside of the US) but by court order the data can be retrieved.

In a recent speech Obama quite clearly stated that actual phone conversations are not being recorded, and this seems plausible as it’ll make people very nervous, but it is likely to happen in the future when transcription software becomes more powerful, particularly in Europe.

PRISM itself is apparently the name of the surveillance program I’ve talked about previously. The US government creates extensive profiles of all unencrypted Internet traffic that travels through US territory. The software will try to attach email addresses, usernames, passwords, and other information to a certain identity. If the IP address is American the data can only be retrieved by court order, unless there is strong suspicion that the person is not American and is using a proxy. It’s fairly easy to examine someone’s sleeping pattern for example, and if this indicates someone is sleeping at times most Europeans sleep, this increases the probability of someone not being an American. Using non-American English is another indication that you’re from across the pond. Once the probability that you’re not a US resident reaches 51% your data becomes accessible to the NSA.

The big problem however is encrypted data. To work around this the USA has created a legal framework for companies to handover private data to the government. Doing so without anyone finding out is close to impossible for the larger corporations like Google, not to mention it’d be a public relations nightmare, but smaller companies might be offered financial compensation for taking the trouble to give their data to the NSA. It’s been my suspicion that the USA has a surveillance program in place to monitor the TOR network, and it makes sense to be suspicious of small nifty Internet companies that offer a useful encryption related service for free.

According to an anonymous source Microsoft (2007), Yahoo (2008), Google (2009), Facebook (2009), Paltalk (2009), YouTube (2010), AOL (2011), Skype (2011), and Apple (2012) are leaking information to the NSA. Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, and Apple have already denied these allegations.

I’ve previously wondered if the US government has the balls to tap into Google’s local network and get access to information that’s been shielded by encryption, and my conclusion was that no, they do not have the balls. Would they have the balls to create a rumor that encrypted services, beyond their ability to watch, are being monitored? With full deniability? Most certainly.

So my best guess is that rather than using the Chinese approach (block services that offer https to encrypt the connection) they’re trying to scare people away from using companies that utilize https. Still it’s not a bad idea to consider Russian https encrypted services. For example, VK as an alternative to Facebook, and Yandex as an alternative to Gmail.

Keep in mind that emails are only more private if you send an email from a Gmail account to another Gmail account, or from a Yandex account to another Yandex account. If you link your Gmail account to your VK account, and have VK forward every private message to your email account, the NSA will be reading along. So I’d suggest to link your VK account to a Yandex account and disable all automated email notifications, because the Russian government is reading along as well.

Update 2013-06-09

Based on new information it might be the case that PRISM is used exclusively to analyze information that has been retrieved by court order. If the NSA would for example get a court order for my information Google would hand over everything associated to my user account, and PRISM in turn would be used to analyze this data. There’s a chance the NSA secretly taps into Google, but this would be such a major violation of the US constitution that I doubt this will happen anytime soon.

The software used to analyze all Internet traffic flowing through the USA is called Boundless Informant.

Password Management

A couple of people have gotten locked out of their accounts, and as it can’t hurt to take precautions I’m giving some tips regarding password management and some general information on what governments are capable of.

Governments have the ability to detect you when you visit a suspicious site. If you for example visit the Stormfront website from Belgium and login with your username and password this data will pass through the United Kingdom. The UK secret service may detect that you just logged in to Stormfront and store your username and password, next it can keep a log of all other sites you visit from the same IP address. If you login on Tumblr next the SS (Secret Service) won’t know your password because Tumblr will encrypt your password submission, but as encryption ends after you login the SS can obtain the name of your Tumblr blog. By analyzing your internet traffic the SS can create a list of usernames, email addresses, and passwords you use.

Taking your blog down by juridical means is difficult and time consuming, not to mention the population at large may be uncomfortable with extensive online censorship. If you use the same password on Stormfront and Tumblr it’s possible for the SS to hijack your Tumblr account, or worse, your email account and every service related to it. When the SS hijacks your accounts you’ll simply be unable to log in as they’ll change the password, associated email address, and leave the account in a frozen state. They’ll do so from behind an anonymous proxy so they have complete deniability. If a hacker would hijack your page they will likely vandalize the page and leave offending messages, the SS is unlikely to do so as they want to draw as little attention as possible to their acts of sabotage.

To minimize your risk you should avoid websites that do not encrypt the entire connection using https, this is difficult however as many websites don’t do this. If you need an email address make sure the email provider is hosted in the same nation as the service you are using. So if you make an account on Jux do so from a Gmail, Hotmail, or Zoho email address. If you link an email address to VK do so from a Yandex email address as the Yandex server is in Russia. Doing so will make it harder for governments to intercept password retrieval email messages. Make sure to never use the same password for different accounts, and be particularly careful when it comes to the password of your email address.

Using Tor will help quite a bit at keeping you anonymous, though it’s unclear to what degree the Tor network has been infiltrated by governments, and well written analytical software will still be able to generate a detailed profile if unencrypted services are used, as they don’t need your identity to hijack you, just a list of email addresses and associated passwords you entered on unencrypted websites.

There is reason to believe the German, Norwegian, and UK governments have reached the level of totalitarianism required to subject their citizens to this treatment for ultra-nationalist content. If this seems like paranoia, realize that pretty much any website in support of al-Qaeda is taken down by means of self-censorship, legal threats, hacking, and on rare occasion assassination.

When the European resistance commits another major act of terror it’s likely that Western governments will try to silence anyone who holds the notion that it’s a human right to resist your own genocide. That’s why I suggest that people take precautions because today you are relatively free, but next year you may find yourself having documents on your computer that have been declared illegal, or be on a list of people who support a terrorist organization, and having to wonder when they will come knocking on your door.

For more information read: Online Anonymity and Privacy

Golden Dawn rally draws thousands

An estimated 30,000 supporters of Greece’s nationalist Golden Dawn party marched through Athens on February 2 to commemorate a 1996 military crisis between Greece and Turkey regarding islands in the Aegean sea which cost the lives of three navy officers.

https://vk.com/video_ext.php?oid=-46528724&id=164359992&hash=0f7840f16b654937

There was, not surprisingly given the turnout, no sign of anti-nationalist activists and this is perhaps the first genuine resurgence of nationalism since the defeat of the Axis powers in WWII. Golden Dawn appears to be getting a lot of things right and continues to build its momentum. When watching the video you find yourself in a different world, a world of free men instead of the world of cowards and idiots prostrating themselves before the altar of political correctness that most of us grew up in.

Political correctness will collapse once a large enough portion of the population openly rejects it. Keep in mind that so called ‘far-right’ parties in Western Europe do not openly challenge political correctness as they claim to be anti-racist and reject European Indigenous Rights.

It looks like Golden Dawn will be the first political party openly rejecting multiculturalism that will break the 10% threshold. A democratic solution involving deportation remains impossible, so the next step in the radicalization process is the creation of a separatist party.

Is Resisting Genocide a Human Right?

This seems like a simple question with a simple answer, but back in 2006 three people wrote a large article about the subject, quoting close to 300 sources to support their argumentation. Their analysis bears a strong resemblance to the European situation, and supports the view that the Cultural Marxist ideology is creating an environment where Europeans can become the victim of genocide.

Is resisting genocide a human right?

By studying past and current genocides they have found several pre-cursors to genocide, some of which are:

  1. Undemocratic rule
  2. Suppression of the free press
  3. Active incitement of hatred against minority groups

Cultural Marxist nations are known to suppress free press or have a monopoly on the press, which in modern times is best known as the mainstream media. With this totalitarian control over the media there is no criticism about the lack of free press and freedom of speech, or that only politically correct parties are allowed to participate in the democratic process.

While Europeans are a majority group they are the victim of incitement of hatred, with European males being characterized as an oppressive parasitic upper class. This doesn’t bode well as Europeans  will become a minority in the near future due to low birth rates, combined with mass immigration.

They further analyze the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states:

Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression

The language is weird, and the declaration itself is a joke, but for the sake of argument it does support the right to resist your own genocide.

The document goes into great detail about the right to bear arms as a means to defend against genocide, and takes note that the disarmament of a population is a direct pre-cursor to all major genocides.

South Africa is perhaps the best modern example of disarmament of a vulnerable population group by their government.  Possession of an illegal weapon is punishable by 15 years imprisonment. Semi-automatic weapons are banned and you’re only allowed to have one weapon. The waiting time for a permit can be as long as 5 years, meaning your permit will have expired by the time you get it. Any application will be rejected if the government determines there is a lack of need to possess a weapon. People younger than 27 are automatically denied for being too young. As a result from 1999 to 2007, the number of legal gun owners in South Africa fell by 44 percent. There is a vibrant black market for illegal weapons, and in African fashion, most of those weapons come from army stockpiles.

The Genocide Convention prohibits more than the direct killing of humans. Other actions can constitute genocide, for example, rape would not normally be genocide, but if a commander promoted the widespread rape of a civilian population — with the intent of preventing normal reproduction by that population — then the pattern of rape could constitute genocide.

This leaves one to wonder if it’s genocide when a government was to promote miscegenation (race mixing) by making it appear as normal in movies, claims mixed-race children are healthier while ignoring scientific evidence of increased mental instability, claims mixed-race children are more attractive by promoting attractive mixed race models and declaring race-mix central, Brazil, as having the most beautiful women on earth, while aggressively oppressing any criticism of the practice. To some extend the media does most of the work, while anti-fascists intimidate anyone who speaks out publicly, but in most genocide situation it’s the government who stands idly by while radical activists and militants do the dirty work.

There is no need to send out rape squats if you can indoctrinate a population to create mixed race offspring (with mixed loyalties) voluntarily. In addition many women are afraid to reject the advances of people outside of their race out of fear of being labeled a racist, an accusation that can have significant negative consequences in Western society.

In summary, the article shows that under existing international law, genocide victims are not obliged to wait for foreign governments or world organizations to rescue them. According to international law genocide victims have a fundamental human right to use armed force to resist genocide. Because the prohibition of genocide is a fundamental principle of international law, any local, national, or international laws or government actions which interfere with self-defense by genocide victims are necessarily unlawful. In particular, arms control laws which may sometimes be valid may not be enforced against genocide victims or against persons who supply arms to genocide victims; enforcement would make the enforcing court or other state agency complicit in genocide.